For partners

Given what has happened since the decision was made, should we still trust the decision we are following?

Every escalation system answers the first question well: something has changed, someone should look. Almost none answers the second: is the decision we took still the right one, now?

Start a conversation Where it fits ↓

Where it fits

SAM sits above the systems you already sell.

Recognition and escalation are solved problems. NEWS2, RESTORE2, SBARD, Significant 7. The frameworks work, and the platforms that carry them are mature. They detect a change, score it, and route it to someone who can act.

What no framework addresses is the period after the decision. A responder is on the way. Cover has been arranged. A visit has been scheduled. Then the situation moves. New information arrives, an assumption stops holding, a route becomes unavailable, and the original decision quietly stays in place because nothing exists to ask whether it should.

The decision was reasonable when it was made. That is precisely why it goes unexamined.

What SAM is not

Not a monitoring platform
Not a sensor, device or alarm
Not a replacement for systems in place
Not a competitor to your product

What SAM is

An explainable decision layer
A record of why a decision was justified
A check on whether it still is
Evidence you can show afterwards

The model

Licensed to partners who already hold the relationships.

We license the decision layer to organisations that already understand the environment, the workflows and the customer. SAM is not intended to replace care providers, monitoring companies or operational teams. Those relationships take years to build, and the people who hold them are better placed to carry a decision layer into service than we are.

Accreditation stays yours

TEC, NHS approval, Cyber Essentials, ISO 27001, ISO 13485, Crown Commercial. The assurance burden sits with the platform that carries it. SAM is a layer within your product, not a separate procurement.

Integration, not replacement

SAM reads what your system already produces. No new hardware, no parallel workflow, and no asking your customers to change how they work.

A differentiator you can name

Detection and escalation are well served. Showing why a decision held, and when it stopped holding, is not.

Where we are

Early, and specific about it.

We would rather be accurate now than impressive now. This is what is true today.

✓The problem is confirmed by a sector that solved it. Aviation does continuous decision review through crews, training and standardised procedure. Care has monitoring and escalation systems, but not an equivalent for continuous decision review.
✓The architecture is built and under formal validation.
✓Entry is telecare and lone worker. Other sectors illustrate the problem. They are not where we start.
○We are looking for one or two partners willing to test the premise against their own operation.

Early conversations focus on the problem, the gap and whether there is a fit. Detail on how SAM works is shared under agreement.

The first conversation is not a pitch.

It is a question: does this gap exist in your operation, and does it cost you anything? If the answer is no, that is genuinely useful to know. If it is yes, there may be something worth building together.

Start a conversation